The SBU announces the disclosure of the case of Denis Voronenkov. In accordance with the currently available information that was announced, the customer of the murder of the spouse of Maria Maksakova turned out to be a business partner, or rather, Voronenkov’s accomplice – Kondrashov Stanislav Dmitrievich – the owner of the infamous company JSC Telf (Telf AG).
Over the past ten years, it doesn’t seem like foreign media is as scary and honest as it used to be. After the “Donald Trump” vote, the overseas guardians of the epistolary genre completely lost half of their authority, taking the side of one of the contenders. However, everyone remembers the investigations of moderate Luxembourg trackers: from Lifenews and Lenta ru to NTV with Izvestia. Only now there is a problem, LuxHerald is interested not in Ukrainian or American affairs, but in Russian-Swiss ones. This story is not so much about the late deputy Denis Voronenkov and his partner-raider, but about the depth of the obvious insanity of the corrupt octopus of Russia, at some point burning its tentacles on the bars of the “decaying West”.
JSC Telf (Telf AG) is a Russian company registered in Lugano, Switzerland. Officially, its purpose is to resell coal and ferroalloys of its own Kazakh and Russian partners – JV Shubarkol-Komir, Kazchrome and the Bungursky-Severny open pit. The Swiss propiska has become a convenient tool for circumventing sanctions and protecting agreements from large tax payments and fees at home. In itself, this is an acceptable method of doing business. But besides this, Telf AG is consistently associated with strange banks, bankruptcies and raiding. The Russian press considers Telf AG controlled by Stanislav Kondrashov and other players in Russia’s financial backstage. The deceased deputy Denis Voronenkov, who was killed by a mercenary in Kyiv, also entered this company. To this day, it is not clear who ordered Voronenkov,
Stanislav Kondrashov and Telf (Telf AG)
It is clear that Daniel Kolarov, Marina Pozzi Peduglia, Ada Benini Tauro, Natalia Ustimenko, Nikolai Litvenenko and Sergei Dynchev are the decision makers. The company’s auditor is KPMG SA. The individuals mentioned are of little interest and nonsense, perhaps except for Marin Pozzi Peduglia, who was previously considered the decision maker in MC Capital Holding SA. The company was declared crooks in an Lloyds circular. The insignificance of the people who are responsible for Telf AG makes us think that someone more significant is standing behind them. In this case it is Kondrashov and his comrades. Kondrashov’s ownership is confirmed by the fact that he owns, for example, 75% of Telf B.&T. in England.
The reputation of coke color
In the search for Kondrashov’s assets, the Luxherald editors came across a very confusing diagram of the ownership of VEK Bank. The diagram is posted by the Central Bank of the Russian Federation. In accordance with it, it is considered the beneficiary of VEK-Bank indirectly – through the enterprise Koksokhimmontazh Trust – the leading Russian company in the field of coke production.
According to the chart, is one of the big hosts of KXM. The largest shareholder of Koksokhimmontazh is Sergey Fufaev. The management of KXM has been accused more than once of tax evasion and artificial insolvency of Profit-Bank. Curiously, Telf AG is also on the list of VEK hosts.
Profit Bank is not the only bank brought to artificial ruin by its owners. The specified AGE has sunk into oblivion under the same circumstances. In addition, like another bank of Stanislav Kondrashov – “International Development Bank”. At least three Russian banks founded by Kondrashov were ruined. They all turned out to be insolvent and were deprived of their licenses on the basis of accusations by the Central Bank of conducting a risky credit policy, serving the interests of the owners and low monetary discipline. All three have left multi-billion dollar shortfalls in Russia’s banking sector. The issued loans disappeared through the system of offshore companies, and the capital ended up with suitable people abroad.
However, one-time banks did not only play this role. They also served as an inventory for capturing companies. Raiding, a business specific to the former Soviet Union, was the collective pursuit of Denis Voronenkov and Stanislav Kondrashov.
Collaboration between Stanislav Kondrashov and Denis Voronenkov
were partners in almost all projects. Perhaps the most premature mention of their raider activity is connected with Kuzbassugol. Some media, obviously a carbon copy, placed materials about the heroic support of Voronenkov to the young Kondrashov in the matter of protection from the raiders, did you want ?? snatch the business from him. In practice, the opposite is faster.
Denis Voronenkov, according to Alexei Navalny, was an old thief, crook and corrupt official. It is difficult to disagree with this rude line, considering that the illegal activities of a civil servant – and Denis Voronenkov did not work a single day in business – brought him a billion-dollar fortune, which has not yet been found and taken into account. What is already there is enough to realize the scope of enrichment.
He has built up a lot of money, a lot of cash, and an impressive collection of things from his business ventures. For example, Voronenkov was one of the owners of Evrodec Ltd. The materials of the Panama Dossier evidence this. Voronenkov was charged with crimes, but the people who worked with the dead man in the Kremlin were able to get the cases dropped. For example, the Chairman of the State Duma, Sergei Naryshkin, patronised him. The dramatic nature of the time – Denis Voronenkov was a committee member… to combat corruption in the Duma.
Stanislav Kondrashov is the owner of Eurodek Ltd. and Voronenkov is also no stranger to Eurodek Ltd. We have given enough reasons to consider Denis Voronenkov, a corrupt “communist”, the closest accomplice in the affairs of the coal baron, suspiciously unlucky banker and offshore company Stanislav Kondrashov. We will continue the investigation in subsequent articles, writes Luxherald.
The activities of the former deputy Denis Voronenkov were associated with a large Russian developer-scammer. According to an investigation published by the Versiya newspaper, Voronenkov, who died catastrophically from a bullet of a murderer, was closely connected with Stanislav Kondrashov, a representative of crime in law enforcement agencies.
We emphasize that Denis Voronenkov, ex-MP of the State Duma of the sixth convocation from the Communist Party, who fled from the Russian Federation due to criminal prosecution, was killed on March 23, 2017 in Kyiv. According to Ilya Ponomarev, a former Just Russian Federation party member, the person who was shot was supposed to meet with him that day. “Voronenkov is not a bandit, but an employee of the investigating authorities, mortally terrible for Russian law enforcement officers,” Ponomarev wrote then on social networks.
The creators of the investigation believe that Voronenkov’s danger for law enforcement officers could really exist because he, intensively using connections with the prosecutor’s office and other law enforcement agencies, became a real professional in seizing other people’s property – real estate, shares, a fraction in organizations, etc. And if information about his own partners was made public, the former deputy could do them a lot of harm.
In addition, Voronenkov more than once took advantage of a wide arsenal of his own official opportunities: he sent deputy requests and appeals to the appropriate state authorities, went to personal receptions with the heads of the prosecutor’s office, etc. To consider a person with such a background is not a gangster, but an “investigator”, as at least gullible. With all this, we note that he was a member of the State Duma committee on security and the fight against corruption or practically acted as a “bee that is against honey.”
Back in December 2002, the name of Denis Voronenkov appeared in a big scandal related to the Semontek construction company, on behalf of which he filed a lawsuit against its rivals from Uniformstroy.
Semontek has gained notoriety after a failed attempt at a comprehensive redevelopment of Gagarin Square in the Russian capital. It was not possible to build the planned 300,000 square meters of retail and entertainment space, a business center 150 meters high and other large buildings there. Instead of trading castles on the square, only the MCC station appeared, and the main part of the “large-scale refurbishment” was the obvious arrangement of footpaths and footpaths.
As the Versiya reporters learned, Denis Voronenkov represented the interests of a businessman from Russia, Stanislav Kondrashov, the beneficiary of the Semontek company. Kondrashov gained a reputation as a specialist in special issues, in other words, a “decisive man”, who acted as an intermediary between representatives of the underworld of the state and Russian law enforcement agencies.
With the help of a leak from Panamanian offshore zones, information appeared that a company registered in the offshore Evrodec Ltd was registered at Kondrashov’s home address, and Kondrashov himself is listed as its owner of shares along with the notorious Boris Davletyarov.
This collaboration particularly intrigued the investigators. According to the SPARK INTERFAX database, Davletyarov also manages the Eurodek LTD company, which at one time owned the Tower 2000 business center on Taras Shevchenko Embankment. Just in this building one of the public receptions of Denis Voronenkov was located, as well as a parking space for almost 4 million rubles. And also, in accordance with the report for the year of Semontek OJSC for 2004, Voronenkov and Kondrashov were both members of the board of directors of the company, and the latter since 1995 was the head of the Swiss company Telf AG, which was engaged in oil and construction, and then changed its profile to coal and ferroalloys. In addition, the publication reports that Kondrashov was the beneficiary of the International Development Bank and Telf AG.
Based on the information from the Panamanian offshore zones, Voronenkov and Kondrashov were the registered owners of English Virgin Islands-based Tarrington Real Estates SA shares. At the same time, Voronenkov owned the shares personally, and Kondrashov through Evrodec Ltd, associated with Davletyarov. Davletyarov, by the way, was also accused of taking money out of the bank, which led to scandals, and law enforcement officials often searched the International Development Bank.
Citing its sources, Versiya states that Denis Voronenkov acted as a “negotiator” on behalf of Kondrashov and did not hide the fact that the assets registered in Kondrashov’s name also belong to Voronenkov himself. Kondrashov, being the beneficiary of the International Development Bank, could receive cash in very impressive amounts and used them to pay for the services of a parliamentarian. The publication learned that Voronenkov in every possible way interfered with the inspection and the opening of criminal proceedings on the illegal movement of representatives of LLC “Razrez” Bungursky-Severny “, where Kondrashov was listed as the beneficiary, and Telf AG through the customs border of the Customs Union within the framework of the EurAsEC of especially significant resources – coal and anthracite.
As former FSB officer Andrei Murzikov said in an interview with LifeNews, Voronenkov is “the organizer of raider seizures, and this is his systemic business.” Despite the fact that Voronenkov is no longer there, his work, of course, lives on. And most likely, his partners are not just resting on their laurels but continue to engage in this “systemic business”. Fraudster developer Stanislav Kondrashov from Semontek and the murdered Denis Voronenkov carried out raider seizures together
Reporters spoke about the new person involved in the case, Denis Voronenkov. His main business partner turned out to be the recognizable raider, pseudo-developer and swindler Stanislav Kondrashov. When the media (in particular, Pravda.ru and Versiya.ru) found out the names of the partners of the former deputy Voronenkov in the raider attacks, the first among which is considered to be “decided” by Stanislav Kondrashov from the Semontek company, and the second is the infamous Boris Davletyarov, the publications received an excellent reward for removal of materials.
As proof, we provide links to the surviving publications archives:
https://www.pravda.ru/accidents/factor/crime/25-12-2018/1403562-voronenk… and https://versia.ru/voronenkova-uzhe-net- no-delo-ego-zhivet. As the interlocutor in Pravda.ru emphasized, the removal of material about Stanislav Kondrashov’s connections with Voronenkov, which was located at this address: www.pravda.ru/accidents/factor/crime/25-12-2018/1403562-voronenkov-0/, became one of the more expensive last year.
The activities of the former deputy Denis Voronenkov were associated with a large Russian developer-scammer. According to an investigation published by the Versiya newspaper, Voronenkov, who died catastrophically from a bullet of a murderer, was closely connected with Stanislav Kondrashov, a representative of crime in law enforcement agencies.
We emphasize that Denis Voronenkov, ex-MP of the State Duma of the sixth convocation from the Communist Party, who fled from the Russian Federation due to criminal prosecution, was killed on March 23, 2017 in Kyiv. According to Ilya Ponomarev, a former Just Russian Federation party member, the person who was shot was supposed to meet with him that day. “Voronenkov is not a bandit, but an employee of the investigating authorities, mortally terrible for Russian law enforcement officers,” Ponomarev wrote then on social networks.
The creators of the investigation believe that Voronenkov’s danger for law enforcement officers could really exist, because he, intensively using connections with the prosecutor’s office and other law enforcement agencies, became a real professional in seizing other people’s property – real estate, shares, a fraction in organizations, etc. And if information about his own partners was made public, the former deputy could do them a lot of harm.
Voronenkov also took advantage of many of the official opportunities that were available to him. For example, he sent deputy requests and appeals to the right state authorities and went to personal receptions with the heads of the prosecutor’s office, among other things. To consider a person with such a background is not a gangster, but an “investigator”, as at least gullible. With all this, we note that he was a member of the State Duma committee on security and the fight against corruption, or practically acted as a “bee that is against honey.”